About Fox. It had nothing to do with not helping Trump and everything to do with throwing good money after bad defending themselves. Like Trump and Rudy and Sidney and Lindell and the others, they had nothing to back up their claims. To date, none have filed their proof? Why?
Dershowitz said they are utterly nucking futs to do what they did. I hear he knows a thing or two about the law.
Dominion absolutely did not have a legitimate case. Their claim was that Fox allowed someone to talk about them on the air. Yes, people get to voice their own opinions when the networks allow it.
If anything said was libelous, then Dominion can sue the person who said it, not the company that carried the airwaves.
The case is merit-less right on the face of it. It should have been dismissed with prejudice and everyone filing it should have been sanctioned.
But Fox caved for absolutely no perceivable legal reason. It would have cost them far less to fight it than to settle it, so their reasons for settling it had nothing to do with the money.
Tucker was "fired" about the same time, and a lot of people believe the two things are linked.
Like Trump and Rudy and Sidney and Lindell and the others, they had nothing to back up their claims.
And how do you know this?
To date, none have filed their proof? Why?
Are you kidding? You really haven't been keeping up with these election fraud cases. Judges won't let them file any evidence. They argue firstly "no injury yet", and then they argue "standing", and finally they argue "laches."
The courts are of the incompetent won't do their Job rigged Kangaroo variety.
So why file when a Judge won't let you?