Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. Times Says It Was “Incorrect” to Rely on Hamas Claims to Wrongly Blame Israel for Gaza Hospital Blast
The Hollywood Reporter ^ | OCTOBER 23, 2023 | Etan Vlessing

Posted on 10/23/2023 2:07:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway

“Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation” of the Oct. 17 Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion in Gaza City — caused by a misfired rocket aimed at Israel — the marquee newspaper said in a statement.

The New York Times has said it was wrong to “heavily” rely on claims by the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas that Israel was to blame for the Oct. 17 Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion, without first verifying those claims.

“The Times’ initial accounts attributed the claim of Israeli responsibility to Palestinian officials, and noted that the Israeli military said it was investigating the blast. However, the early versions of the coverage — and the prominence it received in a headline, news alert and social media channels — relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was,” the N.Y Times said in an editor’s note shared on its Instagram account.

The marquee U.S. newspaper is the latest major media outlet to concede that its early and fast-shifting reporting on the deadly Gaza City hospital blast relied on Palestinian sources, where follow-up coverage and investigations revealed the cause was a misfired rocket aimed at Israel.

The Times said its own coverage relied on “claims by Hamas government officials that an Israeli airstrike was the cause and that hundreds of people were dead or injured. The report included a large headline at the top of the Times’ website.”

Israel, after its own investigation, said that a Palestinian rocket, launched by the Palestinian terrorist group Islamic Jihad, misfired and exploded in mid-air and fell on the hospital grounds, a claim that the U.S. and other countries have since confirmed after their own assessments as they absolved Israel of responsibility for the bomb blast.

The Oct. 17 explosion and carnage at the hospital in Gaza City came just ahead of U.S. President Joe Biden’s trip to Israel for a diplomatic mission. Early misreporting on the blast had a reverberating impact on both Biden’s visit, as his meeting with Arab leaders was called off, and contributed to a rise in antisemitic attacks in both Europe and the U.S.

Other major U.S. outlets, including CNN, The AP and The Wall Street Journal, have since published independent investigations to correct their reporting on the hospital rocket misfire. The BBC also apologized for initially blaming Israel for the attack.

American intelligence agencies have also reduced the death toll for the hospital explosion from an initial 500 or more fatalities, according to the Hamas-run Gazan health ministry on Oct. 17 — another claim subsequently reported by many U.S. outlets — to a death toll closer to between 100 and 300.

The Times’ full Instagram statement is below:

On Oct. 17, The New York Times published news of an explosion at a hospital in Gaza City, leading its coverage with Israel subsequently denied being at fault and blamed an errant rocket launch by the Palestinian faction group Islamic Jihad, which has in turn denied responsibility. American and other international officials have said their evidence indicates that the rocket came from Palestinian fighter positions.

The Times’s initial accounts attributed the claim of Israeli responsibility to Palestinian officials, and noted that the Israeli military said it was investigating the blast. However, the early versions of the coverage — and the prominence it received in a headline, news alert and social media channels — relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.

The Times continued to update its coverage as more information became available, reporting the disputed claims of responsibility and noting that the death toll might be lower than initially reported. Within two hours, the headline and other text at the top of the website reflected the scope of the explosion and the dispute over responsibility.

Given the sensitive nature of the news during a widening conflict, and the prominent promotion it received, Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation, and been more explicit about what information could be verified. Newsroom leaders continue to examine procedures around the biggest breaking news events — including for the use of the largest headlines in the digital report — to determine what additional safeguards may be warranted.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Iran; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: incorrectimpression
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: packrat35

And 500 dead!

Not fit for birdcage liner


21 posted on 10/23/2023 2:55:49 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Back in 1969, I used to listen to Radio Moscow to see how many hospitals and orphanages the US bombers were hitting. It seems our aircraft constantly took those two things out in all their bombing runs.

You never get the truth from the enemy.


22 posted on 10/23/2023 3:17:05 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Gaza delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Exactly!

Also wondering what precipitated the feigned “apology”


23 posted on 10/23/2023 3:22:40 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

did The Slimes give a reason for using a completely fake image of the SUPPOSEDLY blown-up hospital?


24 posted on 10/23/2023 4:11:40 PM PDT by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Far too little, and far too late.

The damage has already been done. They sowed the wind, and we are now reaping the whirlwind of worldwide Anti-Semitism at levels unseen since 1930s Germany.


25 posted on 10/23/2023 4:58:57 PM PDT by Kriggerel ("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TiGuy22

Someday, maybe NY Times may realize how erroneous it is to rely on ANY Hamas claims. Not that all their claims are necessarily wrong, but you have to ask yourself if you would rely on all their claims, considering who they are.


26 posted on 10/23/2023 5:51:36 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Let’s be fair about this...those who believe Hamas claims about the incident can assume that 500 Palestinian were killed. Those who believe the fault for the incident lies at the feet of Hamas can probably safely assume that maybe only about 100 were killed.


27 posted on 10/23/2023 5:57:01 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

True.
They extremely quickly counted all the dead to make the 500 announcement. In reality even the Israelis are now estimating and re-evaluating how many people must be missing, hostages, dead, American, Israeli and so on. Days after the Hamas attacks. So how are the NYT and Hamas so quick at math?

Also, the hospital was hit by Israel was the story sent around the world immediately. Protests started in the streets and at college campuses.

Then it was seen that the parking lot of the hospital has been hit directly. So another story went out.

Then video of abortive rocket launch by Hamas within Hamas held territory was seen. Well, deny it, maybe photoshopping tricks with cgi or spliced video or something. But technical experts concluded the video was genuine.


28 posted on 10/23/2023 6:08:58 PM PDT by frank ballenger (“My job is to inform, not to convince.” St. Bernadette Soubirous )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nick

BTTT


29 posted on 10/23/2023 6:17:37 PM PDT by deks (We're never stuck. You can change the story...any time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the smartest people in the room....


30 posted on 10/24/2023 7:44:35 PM PDT by Tzimisce ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson