Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW

I’m guessing the court’s reason is the Nasdaq is private and listing is voluntary.


7 posted on 10/20/2023 5:58:41 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

But the rule requires abrogating the company’s fiduciary responsibility - under law - to stockholders. That’s my sticking point.


10 posted on 10/20/2023 6:06:39 AM PDT by MortMan (I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather
"I’m guessing the court’s reason is the Nasdaq is private and listing is voluntary."

If it's not in the Constitution; isn't this a "States Rights" issue?

"The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It expresses the principle of federalism, also known as states' rights, by stating that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution..."

29 posted on 10/20/2023 8:22:19 AM PDT by guest7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson