“CPSC said there have been 39 incidents of consumers reporting that their safes have been accessed by unpaired fingerprints.
‘Consumers can believe they have properly programmed the biometric feature when in fact the safe remains in the default to open mode, which can allow unauthorized users, including children, to access the safe”
My Samsung smartphone is astonishingly accurate in the fingerprint process. (And fast).
And I’m in the fingerprint “business”.
Thanks. It’s an odd way of phrasing it. “Consumers can believe they have properly programmed the biometric feature when in fact the safe remains in the default to open mode, which can allow unauthorized users, including children, to access the safe”.
Sounds like the consumers are not properly programming it, but I am not sure from that sentence. Maybe there is a glitch that keeps them from shutting off the default to open mode.