Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reverend Wright

Rumsfeld wanted to get rid of all artillery or just the Crusader Weapon System?


28 posted on 10/19/2023 7:18:17 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

I think the political fight was over the Crusader, but the thinking underlying it was that artillery was obsolete.

“While it might have been a terrific weapon for the set-piece battles it was designed for—against massed Soviet forces in the flats of Central Europe—the Crusader figured to be of dubious use in short-lead-time maneuver warfare in faraway mountainous places like Afghanistan. And so the Army will have to make do with its Gulf-War-era howitzers, with their much slower rate of fire, eventually to be augmented by a precision-guided round, as well as various planned mobile surface-to-surface rocket systems.”

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2002/05/what-the-crusader-cancellation-really-means-to-the-army.html


29 posted on 10/19/2023 7:35:33 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson