Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric
The point of my initial reply concerned the ethics of western investments anticipating financially healthy Chinese military groups while at the same time arguing against China's transgressions.

My understanding of the index concept based on weighted averages is that as an investor we are agnostic about any one investment in the index. There is no judgement being made other than diversity. One of the theories that supports indexing is based on diversifying your investments over the worlds capital markets.

For example, if the China stocks were removed from the index tomorrow I and others would probably not notice the change in our total values because other changes would outweigh it.

As such it is not a contradiction to desire the failure of the China companies and at the same time for the index to hold those shares. If those companies went bankrupt, other companies would take up the slack.

12 posted on 10/16/2023 2:03:37 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

Of course, that all makes sense.

The ethical aspects are mainly the responsibility of the investment managers. But still, the client investors shouldn’t turn a blind eye as to what’s in their portfolio.


13 posted on 10/16/2023 2:17:58 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson