I guess, my only thought is:
“How long do the Dems have to count the votes?”
I can see in my mind’s eye huge fleets of pirogues loaded with ballets heading to the various counting stations. Thousands of pirogues all setting deep in the water, overloaded with ballots.
“How long do the Dems have to count the votes?”
By law, Saturday night.
All the non-election day voting also has to be counted by the end of election day.
A solid Trump endorsement, Landry slaughtered Dems......and so will 2024 candidate Trump.
Trump’s Presidential Immunity Defense May Just Lead To An Election Indictment Dismissal
Trump is arguing that presidents, even after their term is over, are absolutely immune from criminal prosecutions arising out of their acts in office.
Thursday afternoon in a Washington, D.C., federal court, former President Donald Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case pending against him there for his alleged actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election. The motion cites presidential immunity as a ground to dismiss the case in its entirety.
The motion persuasively argues that the D.C. case should be dismissed, and if past practice is any guide all proceedings could and should be stayed while this issue is litigated fully, all the way up to the Supreme Court if necessary. Notably, this same reasoning should apply to the ongoing Georgia prosecution as well.
A number of legal commentators have anticipated this move and have stated from the outset that presidential immunity should be an absolute bar to the prosecution of Trump for his alleged acts in office that underlie the federal prosecution in D.C.
snip
Any denial of this motion to dismiss, or any similar motion in Georgia, is likely immediately appealable, as is the case in where congressional legislative immunity is implicated. This means, depending on how long it takes Judge Chutkan to rule, this issue could be before the D.C. Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court before long.
In the meantime, an immunity argument like this one compels a stay of all proceedings, as would be the case in almost any action where immunity forms a potential basis for the avoidance of trial.