Replies

No other topic is more important and explains better the demise of our society than the saga of Hillary Rodham Clinton. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter, but the conclusion’s general outline is that Hillary has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by assailing all that is holy. All she’s increased by doing that is the girth of her bloated ego. I’ll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, I can easily see Hillary performing the following addlepated, haughty acts. First, she will condition the public—or, more precisely, brainwash the public—into believing that her decisions are based on reason. Then, she will subject people to daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind. Remind me again why we do nothing to lead Hillary out of a dream world and back to hard reality even though it is well-established that Hillary has been waging a clandestine guerilla war against many basic human rights? There is widespread agreement in asking that question but there is great disagreement in answering it.

In many ways, it’s scary how many people feel that Hillary’s aides-de-camp are very special people who must never be criticized under any circumstances. Through repetition, this lie births a narrative, and the narrative constructs an alternate reality. We must rescue people from this alternate reality by swaying people toward the realization that when you tell Hillary’s groupies that I get concerned when I see Hillary stifle the free inquiry of science and the application of its discoveries towards bettering the lot of mankind, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don’t care. They have no interest in hearing that someone has been giving her brain a very thorough washing, and now Hillary is trying to do the same to us. While the unintelligent masses will scoff at what I’ve written in this letter, preferring insults to reason, I ask only that those of you who view yourselves as reasonable individuals at the very least try to prove to yourselves that what I have presented is irrefutably false. If you cannot, then you must cede me my point that Hillary Rodham Clinton plays ducks and drakes with a native battery of idioms that prescribes such egregious collocations of vocables as the basic put up with for tolerate or put at a loss for bewilder.