Replies

I have just printed the second link in this comment #102, and also printed the link in comment #107 and read them. I also looked at the link for WND, the source of this story. Will watch Video latter. I was disappointed to NOT find information on exactly what aspects of the immune system had been studied, merely that a lot of people have a reduced competence of their immune system. Below is a comment I wanted to post there, but as I did not want to sign into their system with my personal info, I am posting it here. Perhaps someone could post it there without my personal information.

I was looking for the actual figures on how immune systems were compromised. Was it the IgG 1 thru 4 part, the T cell count component, some other part of the immune system? Were all compromised to some extent? Results on a small IgG study showed IgG3 which fights virus best was wiped out after vaccination #2. IgG4 % increased from less than 1% before a vaccine to an average of almost 20% after the 3rd jab. Some had as high as 50% or more IgG4 after 3rd jab. Unfortunately the IgG4 component learns to ignore the virus so the people with the highest IgG4 percents are the ones who got sick with Covid. All lost their best virus fighter (IgG3) and around 1/4th lost half or more of their IgG system (IgG4), which after so many shots had lost interest in Covid. Sadly I could not find that kind of information at this story. Nor did I see a link for the actual science of the Canadian study.

Regarding the confusion over 73% or 74%. Those figures are probably based on number tested at a specific time. The degree of immunity changes over time as my explanation of what I understand of the IgG should clarify. Immunity increases or decreases over time and is caused by a number of factors, diet, medicine, sunlight, length of time since last vaccine, etc. If you test 100 people and 50 is the cutoff figure for good or poor immunity, you might have 26 people with good immunity (over 50) otherwise 74% poor immunity. If you tested the same group, or a different group of 100 a different day, and 27 had good immunity (over 50) that day that would be 73% with poor immunity. It all depends on whether the score was 51 or higher, or 50 or lower. Statistics are sneaky little devils.

In the study I saw, people were tested for IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 before being vaccinated with Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. call this Test#1. J&J was very early so it was not studied. Test#2 was given a certain number of days after the 1st Covid Vaccine. Similar procedure for Test#3 given ? days after the second Vaccine. Test#4 followed ? days after the third Covid jab. I think they also found results varied depending on how many days after each vaccine.

Key results: All of best virus killer IgG3 was gone soon after the second vaccine. IgG4 becomes indifferent to a specific substance when injected multiple times. That is why it is good for pollen allergies. This is what happened with Covid vaccines. Average at Test#1 (before vaccine) was less than 1% of total IgG component. After Test#2, 4% of total IgG. After Test#3, 8% of total IgG. After Test#4, almost 20% of total IgG. But some tested with IgG4 near 50% and even higher. They are the people who ultimately got sick with Covid. I hate to think what their levels would be after a forth Covid shot. My brother was being treated for metastatic liver cancer, successfully with a tolerable chemo dosage. Before I could warn him, I told me he had just had his 4th Covid jab. Two weeks later he felt terrible, his liver cancer was growing fast, and he was on a much stronger chemo that made him feel awful. They switched him to a $10,000 a month chemo (subsidized for low income) and he has recovered somewhat. He ran out of supplements I had sent him which were to target improving immunity so I will send him more as he does not live near a good store for them, and won’t learn how to use a computer.

For general immunity I recommend a good daily multi vitamin/mineral formula, enough Vitamin D3 (get tested, take more in winter and AC season), Vitamin C every 6 hours in amounts that seem to work well for you (Google Dr Robert Cathcart for high dose medical uses), Zinc (50 mg per day, or higher if sick), and Quercetin (500 mg. if not sick, more as needed) if you can’t get Ivermectin or HCQ from your doctor. At any rate, with my brother, son, and partner all dealing with cancer, I did a deep dive on cancer in addition to Covid.

One study of 9 common cancers found that all cancer tissues were ZINC deficient, even when surrounding normal tissue was adequate or even well supplied. Prostate and liver cancers were included, and were 2 I was worried about. One courageous scientist even suggest testing an IONOPHORE (one I had never heard of) to help cancer patients get ZINC into their virus infected cells. Ionophores I have heard of include HCQ, Ivermectin, Quercetin, HGCG, and Resviratrol. Now you know why Dr. Zelenko on March 23,2020 urged President Trump and Mark Meadows to use HCQ, ZINC, and an Antibiotic to treat early illness in vulnerable people. Who persuaded Trump to ignore this advice and kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. Fauci, Meadows, or even Trump himself? When Trump returned from the hospital, he commented under his breath he HAD taken Zinc, too, after praising Fauci’s darling Remdesivir, and monoclonal antibiodies, and others. He looked angry, WHY?

I also was researching Astaxanthin, one of 3 additional supplements I had added to my usual routine, which was greatly improving my INCURABLE cataracts. After 3 year my cataracts are around 70% better. One cancer study said Astaxantin seemed to increase the rate of apoptosis (normal cell death) in cancer tissues, while it slowed down the rate of apoptosis in normal tissues. In other words Astaxanthin makes cancer die faster, and normal tissue live longer. I think the mechanism has to do with telemeres. Every time a cell divides it looses some of it’s telemeres, thus cancer cells die quicker, and normal cells live longer with Astaxanthin.

Hope this information helps someone, and we should all encourage our Congresscritters to demand we spend more money on supplements research and a little less on drugs. Fauci did not serve us well by spending his $6 billion annual budget almost solely on drug research. Feel free to contact me by Private Reply if you think I might be able to help with a health issue.