I don’t understand this EV idiocy in the traditional sense.
I understand it in the consumer sense, in the engineering sense, etc., but in the traditional sense, in the infrastructure sense it completely and totally baffles me.
In the traditional sense, I think things like: “California, and other states want to ban the sale of ALL ICE vehicles by 2035. There are even people advocating that the deadline be moved up. How can they do this without the infrastructure in place, the charging stations, the battery manufacture, but most importantly, the energy creation infrastructure and the transmission infrastructure? How? How can they do this, it is the equivalent of running full speed towards a cliff, the whips on our backs, and...simply...jumping off. It will be a disaster, the economy will fully fail, and millions of people are going to be destitute as a result. How? How can any thinking person advocate this approach?”
So, I have to think of it all un-traditionally.
I have to throw out the notion that they want it to work. The idea that they want the infrastructure in place. The idea that they believe better technology is a move forward.
When I do that, and think in un-traditional terms, the only thing that makes any sense at all is that the people pushing this know full well what it will do to the economy and the people who work in that economy.
They WANT it to happen.
They WANT it to fail in the sense of what we view as “useful technology” and advances.
They are pushing this, not for any stupid and insane climate impact reason. They are doing this to control the movement of people, to isolate them from the greater population. And they are doing it to destroy society and the consumer economy so they can “rebuild” it in their image of what it should be.
And their image of what it “should be” is smaller, fewer people, less freedom, and greater government control.
All of these EV pushers on FR, we know who they are, are usefull idiots in the march towards automtive and economic insanty.
BTTT!