Assuming we know what the evidence is going to be, which neither of us know.
The Government doesn’t have to prove the election wasn’t stolen, what they are alleging is Trump was trying to overturn the results of the election and engaged in a conspiracy to do so.
Stolen or not, the result was Biden became POTUS, if and it’s a BIG IF, the government puts multiple Trump aides on the witness stand saying they all knew the election was lost before election day and before the results were announced that will be major damning evidence.
Assuming you are right about the burden of proof being on the government to prove the election wasn’t stolen, they will put on tons of evidence pointing out that despite allegation after allegation by Trump, not ONE allegation has been proven in a court of law and they would be right.
The burden of proof over the election being stolen is going to be squarely on Trump.
“what they are alleging is Trump was trying to overturn the results of the election and engaged in a conspiracy to do so.“
That is correct - that is what they are alleging - but there’s nothing wrong with overturning a wrongly certified election.
We all know the election was stolen.
We all know that Team Trump was challenging highly suspicious activity and was completely justified in doing so. The Democrats do the same thing in close elections.
The only people who engaged in a conspiracy to overturn an election were the ones that stole it.
You can defend it all you want, but charging Trump with a “conspiracy to overturn an election” is just more shameful banana republic shit. The whole world is watching while we implode - trying to put the good guys in jail.