> WWJD? <
A good, and often agonizing, question. Would it be moral to try to balance the pluses and minuses of the situation? For example, the use of the two atomic bombs shortened a terrible war. It also killed many civilians, including innocent children.
WWJD?
It all depends on the criteria people use, to evaluate the situation.
Some people take an absolutist position, that abortion kills a baby, and that we should work to ban abortion, in every state.
Those people are not considering the political realities that we are not going to ban abortion in America. But that’s how they view the situation.
Some people don’t care about the politics of abortion, they want abortion stopped and they say we will all stand before God someday. They don’t care about the political environment.
To me, it all depends on the criteria people use to opine on this subject.
If your criteria are that it’s a state issue now, you will have one opinion of what should be done. If your criteria are that we need national restrictions, applicable to all 50 states, you will have another opinion.