Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Cough BS BS
1 posted on 09/15/2023 8:40:03 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

“We shopped very carefully for you, Judge, so we can’t afford to lose you now.”


2 posted on 09/15/2023 8:41:52 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

No deep seated antagonism???

She has already pronounced him guilty.


3 posted on 09/15/2023 8:42:16 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I guess it’s obvious that they have something to hide, or they wouldn’t care if the judge recused herself.


4 posted on 09/15/2023 8:43:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“Special counsel argues judge should not disqualify herself from Trump Jan. 6 case.....”

....because the fix is in.


7 posted on 09/15/2023 8:45:40 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Smith’s team wants to keep their Ace In The Hole Chutkin. Without her their case against Trump is dead.


8 posted on 09/15/2023 8:46:44 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This just confirms the bias


10 posted on 09/15/2023 8:50:51 AM PDT by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan will look like the total Soros/Obama fool she is , hopefully


12 posted on 09/15/2023 8:50:52 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
From the code of conduct for US Judgers:

(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which:

(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

I would say that stating, in open court, that Trump should be in jail shows bias on her part. This should be a slam dunk, but she is a DemonRat, so it will not be.

14 posted on 09/15/2023 8:51:59 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

So how hard do Trump’s lawyers counter this nonsense, without prejudicing their later case?
[Although it strikes me that the case is already fixed...]


15 posted on 09/15/2023 8:52:52 AM PDT by Adder (End fascism...defeat all Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeah, that disgusting B won’t recuse herself. After it goes to SCOTUS when his case is appealed she needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.


16 posted on 09/15/2023 8:56:24 AM PDT by McGavin999 ( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore………)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

For any doubters then this proves that Chutkan is part of the corrupt fix.


17 posted on 09/15/2023 8:57:21 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If she does not recuse herself... if any of the verdicts come in guilty they will not stand, but these Democrat activists do not care about that. This is lawfare plain and simple. Getting guilty verdicts will interfere with the election and facilitate back room deals that they feel will be to their advantage.


19 posted on 09/15/2023 9:04:36 AM PDT by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Jack Smith needs an EXORCISM by his Rabbi he’s so EVIL!


21 posted on 09/15/2023 9:09:18 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I don’t think that Jerk Smith has any intention of “winning.”

The Judge is Biased, Corrupted and Dirty. No way the trial will stand legal muster. The entire trial is for show.

A Bad Show at that.


22 posted on 09/15/2023 9:10:46 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What we need is a law that if a judge is overridden by a higher court, they are personally responsible for paying the defendants’ attorney fees for the case.


23 posted on 09/15/2023 9:11:33 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The judge has no choice. Her bias in undeniable. Her ruling would not be respected in this case, and could lead to justifiable violence. Hmmm…that could be their plan all along.


26 posted on 09/15/2023 9:42:32 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The judge has previously stated Trump should already be in prison...NO EVIDENCE OF BIAS?


27 posted on 09/15/2023 9:53:28 AM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why is Kevin McCarthy still paying for this unhinged, hyperpartisan persecution?

And why are the prosecutors arguing to keep this judge? If they have a real case, the judge shouldn’t matter.

By arguing against the request, they expose their scam.


28 posted on 09/15/2023 9:54:56 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Smith has a vested interest in keeping her on the case. Where would they find another judge who’s such a radical Democrat?


30 posted on 09/15/2023 10:29:10 AM PDT by popdonnelly (All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Such BS. Why would any prosecutor care which judge sees the case if it is so air tight?

Oh wait...


31 posted on 09/15/2023 12:14:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson