This is surrealistic.
The headline says that an "RNC lawyer" is doing X. This guy is NOT an "RNC lawyer." He may have been retained at some point by the RNC at some point in the past for whatever, but per the story, the RNC is not his client now. Whatever he's doing, he's doing for someone/thing else.
The false allegation that an "RNC lawyer" is doing X is then getting turned into an indictment of the RNC -- which is still chaired by Ronna McDaniel, who was Trump's pick for RNC chairman.
If you want to indict the RNC, fine. But if you do, you are indicting The Donald's own personnel selection -- which is easy to do since The Donald's record on appointments is probably the biggest clown car fiasco in the history of presidential appointments.
Don't blame the RNC for something that a lawyer who is not working for the RNC is doing. And if you want to fault the RNC leadership, start with Trump, because he picked the current RNC leadership. On what planet is a president not responsible for the people he selects?
It wasn’t the contents of the article that mattered, it was your comment.
“Trump makes it even trickier because he is leading a cult of personality, not a political party.”
So you are a democrat or a DeSantis Bush bot supporter.
Nice try, but no banana