Judge denies Trump aide Mark Meadows request to pause ruling that sent Georgia election case back to state court

CNBC ^ | 9/13/2023 | Kevin Breuninger

[Alter Kaker]

A federal judge denied former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ request for an emergency stay of a ruling that sent his Georgia election interference case back to state court, a court filing showed Wednesday.

Meadows, former President Donald Trump’s final chief of staff, had asked U.S. District Judge Steve Jones to pause his ruling pending an appeal in a higher court.

But Jones sided with Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis, who on Tuesday urged the judge to reject Meadows’ latest move in his ongoing push to try and move his case to federal court.

Meadows “has not shown he is entitled to an emergency stay,” Jones ruled in an order dated Tuesday and made public Wednesday morning on the docket in U.S. District Court in Atlanta.

Jones on Friday had denied Meadows’ initial bid to move the sweeping Georgia RICO case out of Fulton County and into federal court.

Meadows has also asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to grant an emergency stay, arguing that Jones “egregiously erred” when he refused to remove the case to federal court. The appeals court has not yet ruled on Meadows’ request, but ordered Willis to respond by noon on Wednesday.

Willis’ 41-count indictment in Fulton County Superior Court charges Trump, Meadows and 17 other co-defendants as part of an illegal conspiracy to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia’s 2020 election.

Meadows is charged with one count each of violating Georgia’s racketeering law and solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer. Meadows, Trump and their co-defendants have all pleaded not guilty.

At least four other defendants are trying to move their cases out of Fulton County, which encompasses Atlanta and voted overwhelmingly for Biden in 2020.

[Liz]

Jonathan Turley——If we accept DA Fani Willis’ new legal standard, that of “giving aid or comfort,” as criminal, why not bar every lawyer who helped file claims of 2020 voting fraud from ever running for office?

They all gave “aid or comfort” with their actions.

By this reasoning, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and other Democrats could be barred from ballots for opposing Trump’s 2016 certification, without any basis, along with high-profilers such as Hillary Clinton, who continued to call her lost 2016 election as being “stolen” for years.

In 2016, there were also violent riots in Washington opposing Trump’s inauguration, thanks in no small part to such rhetoric. We can then have different candidates of both parties removed from ballots in every state.

[RideForever]

At least four other defendants are trying to move their cases out of Fulton County, which encompasses Atlanta and voted overwhelmingly for Biden in 2020.

Problem is they can't back that claim up with records required to be saved this long.