[Leaning Right]

We don’t have to debate hypotheticals here. The country has been through this before. We have historical evidence. It’s called Prohibition.

In 1920 it was decided that alcohol was a public health hazard. Therefore, alcohol was banned.

End result? Law-abiding people had no alcohol. But anyone who wanted to break the law could get all the booze they wanted.

A firearms prohibition would turn out the exact same way.

[dfwgator]

They only want to take the guns away from the potential “counter-revolutionaries”.

[Tench_Coxe]

One point in that--a constitutional amendment had to be passed to implement Prohibition. No 'emergency powers'.

I think the people behind the curtain are trying an end around with the WHO 'treaty'.

Grisham may have jumped the gun, or is testing 'compliance' before hand.

I would like to know who is behind the proverbial curtain. Identify them, and then you know who is the real threat.