Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

I guess what I’m suggesting is that any judge should be able to find that the law is unconstitutional on its face.


13 posted on 09/05/2023 10:20:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

“I guess what I’m suggesting is that any judge should be able to find that the law is unconstitutional on its face.“

Well, obviously the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is facially unconstitutional (and ten original Constitution cannot coexist with it).

I’m not so sure about the Voting Rights Act, since Amendment XV conferred on Congress the power to enforce it by “appropriate legislation”.

The core issue is that in a forest of laws covering the treatment of groups, only whites are not a group. That is going to change.


22 posted on 09/05/2023 10:31:42 AM PDT by Jim Noble (They don't think you know but I know that you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson