One can be adamantly non-interventionist and still not be pro Russia.
Sorry, you can’t be half pregnant. Being “non interventionist” in this case is inherited Pro Russia because that policy benefits Russia’s latest genocide of Ukrainians. It’s intellectually dishonest to boot. Everyone knows what will happen to Ukraine, again, stripped of support from friends and allies. Can we at least be honest about that?
There’s support and then there’s support that’s not support. While the West was dithering about tanks, Russia was laying vast mine fields and building extensive defenses, to slow the counteroffensive to a crawl when it finally started in June, in contrast to last year, when they took Herson at a sprint. Despite that, Ukraine has managed to take Robotyne this week, but it took much longer and was much more costly in men and materiel, and they did it with no significant air power, other than missiles and drones. Remember those Polish MIGs that Brandon nixed? The tanks have been sidelined in favor of artillery. Lots of money has been spent not supporting Ukraine, but it seems they want to win regardless.
I’d rather the kit and training were supplied in a timely manner, but on a lend-lease basis. It was good enough for England once upon a time.
Just like a 12 year old girl, if I don’t hate your adversary I MUST love and support them.
Bullshit.
Childish girl thinking.