Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aligncare

“Access restrictions seem more than reasonable.”

Except once allowed it will not stop at just porn. All porn sites already have legally required triggers for local PC parental control applications. These have been in place for years and years now. But it is the responsibility of the parents to actually active and use these. If allowed this concept will be expanded into anything “they” deem as harmful to minors. Such as religion or conservative values.

We really do have to be careful what we ask for in this situation.


39 posted on 09/01/2023 7:10:27 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

BS, there have been age restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and firearms for decades. You can’t buy any of these things online without age verification either.

This is going to go all the way to SCOTUS. It’s really about applying current law to technology.

There is far more research on the physical, mental and social harms of pornographry than there was in the 60’s and 80’s to support the state’s right to regulate a harmful product. Given the billions being made, there is a strong argument to be made that this isn’t free speech, but commercial speech and subject to state regulation like any other adult products.


47 posted on 09/01/2023 9:33:58 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson