No, I understood you perfectly the first time - the feds have no Constitutional authority to meddle in anything like medical decisions as well as a whole host of other things that they have been meddling in.
But saying that it then falls to the states suggests that there is a form of government somewhere that must have the right to make medical decisions for people and we are simply arguing over which level of government that is, whereas my point is that there is NO government, at any level, that has the authority to mandate something like an experimental injection. One of the most fundamental and God-given rights is that of autonomy over one’s own body. This is not just a discussion of Constitutional limits
“...which level of government that is...”
No argument here. Just how it is done. Are they mandating the injections? No. But if you don’t take them the restaurants will close, the supply line will shut down again causing stores to close, the mask mandates will come back, the crowd control rules will go back into effect... And that is because the government, at any level, is using the virus as a tool and not as a illness. And the marker being used is the amount of vaccinations that have been applied and whatever success they can misrepresent. So if the public doesn’t take the shot, and they can supply proof it has, then you lose your privileges and products. It’s not a mandate, just an incentive. Kind of...
wy69