“The defendants should have the right to call her as a witness.”
The prosecutor, hilarious...it’s going to be the best TV ever. Trump does it again.
A review of Fani Willis’ indictment against Trump reveals the woman actually reads
at third grade level w/ a zero IQ. Her ludicrous, politically motivated charges include:
<><>criminalizing free speech,
<><>listing numerous mundane “acts” she “says” further a “conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election.
<><>criminalizing text asking for phone nos “to chat with state leaders”
<><>Trump’s conversations on election results as a “furtherance” of alleged crimes.
<><>Trump’s tweets constitute a “furtherance” of alleged crimes
<><>Trump conspiring when he asked voters to watch televised GA Legislature hearings.
Upshot: Willis would give Democrats a monopoly on election results conversations.
Reality Check
In 2017, a woman sued conservative actor, James Woods, for misidentifying her as a Nazi in an allegedly libelous tweet. The tweet included a photo not of her but of a different woman giving a Nazi salute while wearing a Donald Trump t-shirt at a campaign event.
The court ruled in favor of Woods under the “innocent construction rule.”
She appealed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the ruling.
The “innocent construction rule” requires courts to consider a written or oral statement in context, giving the words, and their implications, their natural and obvious meaning.
If a statement may reasonably be interpreted innocently, it cannot be actionable per se. [Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., 381 F.3d 717, 726-727 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004)]