Posted on 08/26/2023 1:54:56 PM PDT by marktwain
No. Of course not. The real charges are he refused to bow down to the leftist tyranny.
threadreaderapp.com
Fulton County DA Fani Willis regularly questioned election results & used her office to push unfounded election conspiracies.
On the eve of Trump’s arrest in Georgia for “challenging” an election — a deep dive into the prosecutor’s history of doing the *same* thing:
A dive into Fani Willis’ social media proves that she is a hardened, radical activist — not an unbiased “attorney.”
Fani’s pages are littered with BLM propaganda and deep partisan adherence to left-wing ideology.
She openly worships Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Image
Fulton County DA Fani Willis has blatantly and quite illegally used her office for partisan political activity.
Imagine thinking you’ll get “Justice” from a person with a “PROUD DEMOCRAT” mug displayed prominently in their public office.
But it gets much, much worse…
As a public official, Fani Willis regularly and consistently questioned Georgia’s election procedures and pushed unfounded election conspiracy theories on her public social media profile.
Fani is indicting Trump for the *exact* same thing.
Here is a list of examples:
In the days following the 2018 midterms, Fani Willis expressed concerns about the election not being properly run by implying all votes weren’t counted:
In a Facebook post she wrote: “You all better start paying attention to what is really going on…”
Image
Hours after the last ballots in the 2018 midterms were cast, Fani Willis openly boasts about the power Georgia’s Secretary of State has to “control elections”
“Secretary of State will definitely be on the ballot. That person controls elections. I wonder if we yet realize that is an important role? SMDH!”
Two days following the 2020 election she is now criminally indicting Trump for questioning, Fani Willis directly calls the election a “mess”
This meme was posted on her Facebook— seemingly agreeing with Trump on the poor election procedures in 2020
Will she indict herself now?
In a subsequent Facebook post, Fani Willis agrees with a racially-motivated commenter that “only white folk” are voting in the election by expressing skepticism in voting data by replying:
“There at like 116 percent. I am so annoyed. Where are we?”
Willis then goes on to brag about the ability to install “an administration that more closely mirrors our values”
In another Facebook post sent mere hours after polls in the 2020 election had closed, Fani Willis openly suggests Fulton County officials are “throwing out” ballots following mysterious “water leaks” and directly calls on third-parties to intervene in ballot counting processes throughout the entire state of Georgia:
“Georgia could determine who is our next president. A TEAM of lawyers needs to watch them count every single VOTE… What ballots are they throwing out?”
If trump can be prosecuted for this social media post— why not Fani?
IMPORTANT NOTE: At the time of these posts Fani Willis was either running for or serving in elected political office.
Fani questioned elections for her own political gain as a hardened Democrat activist.
Now she is trying to imprison the GOP frontrunner for doing the same.
bttt
This case is important to the future of America. It needs to be taken out of the hands of a couple of man-hating bimbos Big Fani and Judge Tanya. Both are arsehos competing to see which ditz can put Trump and everyone who knows him in prison. FJB.
GOOD!
At least good lawyers and jurists are fighting against the high-handed Fani Willis cabal!!
Meanwhile Marine Harrison Floyd is rotting in the Fulton County jail.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4172605-trump-co-defendant-denied-bond-held-in-jail/
Free him!!!!
Black judge, appointed by Obama. He will deny the motion, and there will have to be an appeal above him. Nothing else on the case matters, not the fax, nothing else.
p
Dragging things out benefit Trump. Fanny wants it done quickly.
Black judge, appointed by Obama.”
all stop. over.
“I will not be disclosing my defense strategy or tactics to the media in advance,” he said.”
Nice to see someone with brains supporting Trump. Hope that continues.
Groan...........
Fani's frivolous suit comes in two broad parts perhaps as both a civil matter as well as the criminal side,
1) Trump's past Constitutional actions and
2) Trump's position as the favored political candidate for the nation's 's highest office.
One might easily imagine Trump could clean her clock with this action (as well as the legal experts who helped her in this regard).
(Frivolous as in filed with the intent to harass, annoy, or disturb the opposite party and subject to loss of license to practice law.)
Slave Fani is just doing her masters bidding.
She is an official prosecutor. The Supreme Court, in 1976, gave her near total immunity, created out of thin air.
Arseho’s! Love it!
I’m so confused. Is this case going to federal court? If it does is that a good thing? If that one guy has federal immunity why doesn’t Trump?
You are correct about that and perhaps it is time for our current, hopefully more enlightened SC to review that 1976 holding.
Thanks for the link, I will quote from it:
...experience shows that this immunity enables prosecutors to disregard constitutional rights in order to pursue convictions.
That is a pretty good argument right there for tossing the doctrine.
1976 decision Imbler v. Pachtman, the Supreme Court created this immunity to serve the “public trust” and ensure “the proper functioning of the criminal justice system".
The Trump et al case ought to be significant enough to gain the attention of our current SC. The prosecutorial behavior in this instance - mass prosecution of a crime where there is no crime - dramatically does quite the opposite of serving that trust or demonstrating proper functioning.
“Necessity” is the operating excuse of every tyrant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.