[Regulator]

Insane.

They took the plain language of the state Constitution and turned it upside down.

By defining who MAY vote, the California state constitution also defines who may not.

So since there is not a declarative sentence defining who may not vote, they conclude that the existing sentence is merely declaratory?

Decision first, rationale later.

[Leaning Right]

Right you are. Using that court’s twisted logic, cats, dogs, trees, etc. should also be able to vote. All you’ve got to do is pass the required legislation.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

California reds and judges say “Constitution? We don’t need no Constitution”. And they are continually proving that.