Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Social Security savable?
American Thinker ^ | 08/25/2023 | Brenton Smith

Posted on 08/25/2023 8:15:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Milton Friedman once observed, “If the government ran the Sahara, in five years there would be a shortage of sand.”

He was right. The government has run Social Security for more than 80 years, and now there is a shortage of security. At this point, the experts believe that someone who is 79 years old today is likely to outlive the system’s ability to pay scheduled benefits.

The solution, according to the White House fact sheet on the 2024 Budget Proposal, is: do nothing, and the Republicans cheered. That leaves a rapidly growing problem to third parties.

Social Security presents a mental challenge to libertarians as a whole. Little on this earth demonstrates more clearly the dangers of big government. Yet, at the same time, the venerated program has set in motion a crisis that likely can only be addressed by a big government.

In theory, Social Security is social insurance where workers pay for benefits that they expect to collect in the future. Since its inception, the program has, for every $1 ever collected, generated $3 of promises for which it doesn’t expect to have money to pay out. In total, the program expects to leave current voters $22 trillion short of a planned retirement.

In other words, while people pay for their benefits, they have not paid enough.

Given that politics is the art of promising more than you can deliver, Social Security is the greatest program in the history of government.

The Libertarian Party’s platform does not abolish Social Security. Rather, it would phase out Social Security. In essence, the government would force future Americans to clean up the mess that they had no role in creating. So, that version of libertarianism isn’t entirely opposed to the use of force by big government.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deficits; dontneedit; enditnow; handouts; retirement; socialism; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2023 8:15:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Is Social Security savable?

Social Security wouldn't have a problem if the politicians hadn't decided to dip into the "trust fund" to fund the budget and to provide handouts to those who NEVER paid into it.

2 posted on 08/25/2023 8:19:51 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Biden Crime Family and Dem Party - Two Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of the CCP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

“Social Security” is like the old Holy Roman Empire that wasn’t holy, wasn’t Roman and wasn’t an empire.

It was a Ponzi scheme with guns from day one.

The “trust fund” still deludes the gullible:

https://moneymorning.com/2017/03/31/the-social-security-trust-fund-is-just-a-stack-of-ious-in-a-west-virginia-filing-cabinet/


3 posted on 08/25/2023 8:23:10 AM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If we are going to have millions of immigrants, get them working and paying into the system. It is the only way we are going to keep the ratio up. But limit benefits to non citizens.

Reduce/eliminate the taxation on SS benefits. This will “stretch” the existing payments without raising the levels.

Raise the annual ceiling on payments into the system.

Audit the process and people on SSI, there has to be some savings there.

Stop using the SS Trust fund to fund the general fund.

There are lots of things people could do. You simply need to be able to talk about them, and block out the screaming from AARP, and the overly dramatic.

Many changes can be introduced to younger participants without impacting current recipients.

Allowing people to bail out is not an option because its a Ponzi scheme and you need cash coming in.


4 posted on 08/25/2023 8:23:27 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We should not save Social Security. It’s nothing more than a ponzi scheme.


5 posted on 08/25/2023 8:25:01 AM PDT by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh for God’s sake...
Run the numbers...
Then remove the fat that has been added into it...
Then investigate the fraud...
Then, run the numbers again...

Then, remove the overseer’s and replace them with excellent financial advisors...

Yes, it’s salvageable...
But not in the hands of petty government officials


6 posted on 08/25/2023 8:25:01 AM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO! The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

“It was a Ponzi scheme with guns from day one.”

I agree. But, when my Congressman was asked about that, his response was that Ponzi schemes are illegal. Since this is run by the government...it’s legal.

You simply have to shake your head at that logic. This is why the country is screwed without term limits.


7 posted on 08/25/2023 8:25:14 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Social Security was a short-sighted failure from its inception. A massive pyramid scheme, benefiting the early beneficiaries the most, the drafters of it knew it was not sustainable as more and more people reached retirement age.


8 posted on 08/25/2023 8:26:41 AM PDT by fwdude (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

YES, I can Fix Social Security in less than 30 days, Permanently.

Immediately Pass a LAW Abolishing ALL Taxpayer Funded Defined Benefit Pensions and Retirement Plans, FORCE EVERY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE NATIONWIDE into Social Security, including and especially Members of Congress. DENY ALL Federal Funds to any State that doesn’t Comply.

It will be fixed OVERNGHT


9 posted on 08/25/2023 8:26:59 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“It’s legal”.

Reminds me of one of my favorite Ayn Rand quotes:

“When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you – you know your nation is doomed.”


10 posted on 08/25/2023 8:28:13 AM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not only is it savable in the fairly near future it will likely be increased to between $2,500-$5,000 per month.

There’s a reason why Donald Trump is so adamant about keeping social security.


11 posted on 08/25/2023 8:28:35 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Basically - NO.

Coming Federal deficit is $1.6 Trillion. Chart the deficit over the last 20 years - its going parabolic, and its unsustainable.

Throw in a recession where tax receipts drop by 20% and the political urge is more “stimulus” to keep bloated, democrat, woke government alive.

BRICS have their own problems, but they can stick it to the USA by not buying Fed.gov debt any longer - which is EXACTLY what they are doing. Who can blame them? Its a bad investment.

At some point, TSHTF and we go to Venezuela-style direct debt monetization


12 posted on 08/25/2023 8:29:15 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

It’s a Ponzi scheme with an ulterior purpose: to take money out of the middle class employed.

If this was really about saving seniors from poverty, we already have innumerable welfare programs available to disburse cash to needy seniors.

Social Security exists to pick the pockets of the employed. To keep the middle class poorer.

And, brother, does it excel at that.


13 posted on 08/25/2023 8:30:53 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
I'll go further.

Make SS VOLUNTARY.

See how many takers there will be.

Pay out the existing contributors, or negotiate a buyout. I'll take 5 cents on the dollar on all past contributions as long as I never have to pay 6.2% into the failed system ever again.

14 posted on 08/25/2023 8:32:45 AM PDT by fwdude (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

At the risk of oversimplifying it, someone somewhere needs to set up a spreadsheet. And input data with assumptions about money coming in, and money going out. And then do some “what if” analysis, what if cost of living adjustments are adjusted, what if the retirement age is raised, what if this or that change is made.

And then also, Social Security at one time was completely separate from the rest of the federal budget. Somewhere along the way, it was merged into the rest of the federal budget.

If Social Security were completely separate, much as all of our 401K and pension plans are completely separate from the finances of the companies we work for, we would all have a clearer picture of the situation, and better ideas of what, if anything, should be done to balance the budget of Social Security.


15 posted on 08/25/2023 8:33:28 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If they can send all that to Ukraine, they better cough a lot more for we the people. French style revolution.


16 posted on 08/25/2023 8:35:28 AM PDT by exnavy (Grow your faith, and have the courage to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

You are negotiating with these guys:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c3bhh8fqYs


17 posted on 08/25/2023 8:35:37 AM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover
We should not save Social Security. It’s nothing more than a ponzi scheme.

What about people who have been forced to pay into SS their entire working lives and are now finally drawing benefits (I'm one of them).
18 posted on 08/25/2023 8:39:33 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“Pay out the existing contributors, or negotiate a buyout. I’ll take 5 cents on the dollar on all past contributions as long as I never have to pay 6.2% into the failed system ever again.”

F___ that, I want 100% of my contribution with interest. or I can just deduct that amount from my future income taxes.


19 posted on 08/25/2023 8:41:37 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

Same.


20 posted on 08/25/2023 8:42:27 AM PDT by MarMema (Eat your bananas, enjoy the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson