[Toespi]

I have to admit, I believe OJ killed them. BUT, there were several things that gave me reasonable doubt. From testimony and evidence I truly believe the cops played with the blood to enhance their case. I also think the glove was a throw down. In addition, the pilot who asked to see his Super Bowl ring on his trip from LA to NY and the photographer who sat beside him both testified, definitively, there was no cut on his hand. I am not sure I would have been able to convict him. The cops and prosecution lost this case.

[woodpusher]

The detectives/criminalists played with the evidence and got caught. It made it difficult to look at specific evidence and determine if it was real. Numerous times false testimony was demonstrated. Who can forget Barry Scheck to crimnalist Dennis Fung after showing a a photo or video asking, "Where is it, Mr. Fung?" Evidence supposedly collected from a specific location simply wasn't there. The prosecution lost credibility. It left me unable to say with certainty if O.J. did it or not. He may have done it.

At the civil trial, much was made of the Bruno Magli shoes. It later came to light that Bruno Magli was a designer and not a manufacturer. The soles were made by Silga Gomma and the manufacturer sold them to twenty companies. That sort of destroys the shoeprints as evidence of O.J.'s presence at the crime scene.