Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Claims Of Election Misconduct Were Never Adjudicated In Georgia
ConservativeHQ ^ | August 17, 2023 | George Rasley

Posted on 08/17/2023 10:32:37 AM PDT by deks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: deks

This will be like Alex Jones’ trial (maybe trialS). The judge forbade ANY evidence by Jones to be admitted. I think the Jones trial was a dry run for future Trump cases.

Jones was forbidden to even say he was innocent.


21 posted on 08/17/2023 11:10:45 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delchiante
Trump knows she won't allow it in court on TV Live so he's getting ahead of it. She may cut his mic and gag him and cuff him during his presser.
22 posted on 08/17/2023 11:11:02 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
What are the implications of this for the current charges against Trump?

The basis for the charges against President Trump was the phone call to Brad Raffensberger asking him to "find 11,780 votes." This filing documents why President Trump believed there were votes that were incorrectly included in the counts that, by law, should have been challenged and thrown out.

The Soros DA and LAAP-dog media were trying to set the narrative that Trump was asking Georgia officials to create votes because that's what Democrats do, so it's only natural that they would impute that behavior onto Republicans.

The court filings go towards President Trump's state of mind, and were backed up with detailed, documented evidence that he expected to be adjudicated in court. That fact that no court would hear his challenge is why he believes that the election was stolen from him. Now that the Democrats are using his words to frame an insurrection narrative, President Trump is providing the details of why he believed the things that he said.

-PJ

23 posted on 08/17/2023 11:24:12 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay; thegagline
The establishment and propaganda media of course just lied and stated that courts had ruled no fraud, and that is just not true at all.

Ping to "thegagline".

24 posted on 08/17/2023 11:35:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: deks

The 2020 GA election was utterly shot through with anomalies at minimum and corruption at (not even) worst.


25 posted on 08/17/2023 11:36:51 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (The Democrat breadlines will be gluten-free. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Thx.


26 posted on 08/17/2023 11:37:05 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
The Wood v. Raffensperger case was not unlawfully blocked from being heard. The Trump appointed judge dismissed the case because 1. The plaintiff lacked standing 2. The complaint was untimely [Doctrine of latches] 3. The plaintiff failed to set forth the requisite cognizable harm which is needed to trigger the equal protection claim.

It should be noted that Lin Wood was the plaintiff's attorney. The Court pointed out that Wood's sole legal authority regarding standing was a case that was abrogated 13 years ago. It was no longer good law.

27 posted on 08/17/2023 11:45:26 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deks

I’M THINKING...PERHAPS THIS IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT TRUMP PRESS CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE ABOUT.


28 posted on 08/17/2023 11:57:36 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

IF TRUMP SAVES IT FOR THE TRIAL, THE JUDGE MAY NOT ALLOW IT.

I SAY...GET IT OUT THERE.


29 posted on 08/17/2023 11:59:03 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deks
Have they announced who the judge will be at the trial?

They are trying to send Trump and 18 others to prison for complaining about election fraud.

30 posted on 08/17/2023 12:11:12 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Judge Scott McAfee

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2023/08/15/what-to-know-about-scott-mcafee-the-new-judge-overseeing-trumps-georgia-rico-case/?sh=7bcddf0fa3d2


31 posted on 08/17/2023 12:18:50 PM PDT by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: deks

Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy

Here we go again: another disastrous Trump indictment!:

It’s downright pathetic that Fulton County publicly posted the indictment on its website even before the grand jury had finished convening.

Since the four prosecutions against Trump are using novel & untested legal theories, it’s fair game for him to do the same in defense: immediately file a motion to dismiss for a constitutional due process violation for publicly issuing an indictment before the grand jury had actually signed one.

He should make a strong argument on these grounds & it would send a powerful message to the ever-expansive prosecutorial police state. As someone who’s running for President against Trump, I’d volunteer to write the amicus brief to the court myself: prosecutors should not be deciding U.S. presidential elections, and if they’re so overzealous that they commit constitutional violations.

Then, the cases should be thrown out, and, they should be held accountable!:

https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1691149756272095248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1691149756272095248%7Ctwgr%5E03de55a0d2ed54469beecd117205d4cb03a3b396%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthepostmillennial.com%2Ffulton-county-clerk-who-leaked-trump-charges-says-she-accidentally-send-instead-of-save


32 posted on 08/17/2023 12:20:15 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Send Asylum Seekers to empty college dorms/class rooms in NY/NJ/Mass/West Point & NE blue citiesl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...

Want On or Off list? Frmail me.


33 posted on 08/17/2023 12:48:58 PM PDT by Liz (More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones. St Teresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I agree. They showed themselves to be cowards.


34 posted on 08/17/2023 12:56:26 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: deks

btt


35 posted on 08/17/2023 12:57:43 PM PDT by GailA (Constitution vs evil Treasonous political Apparatchiks, Constitutional Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Eh. Why ping that????

That person is all on board with the Stalinist show trials. Adds nothing to the discussion.


36 posted on 08/17/2023 1:02:17 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
The Wood v. Raffensperger case was not unlawfully blocked from being heard. The Trump appointed judge dismissed the case because 1. The plaintiff lacked standing 2. The complaint was untimely [Doctrine of latches] 3. The plaintiff failed to set forth the requisite cognizable harm which is needed to trigger the equal protection claim.

Yup. Legal garbage they use when they *DON'T* want to do their job.

This is why so many people have a horrible opinion regarding Judges. People seem them as stupid, insane, and/or corrupt.

37 posted on 08/17/2023 1:27:28 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tucsonican
Yep. That was the ruling here in AZ when Lake brought her case. The judge said, in effect, “the law says they had to follow a process, not that the process needs to be reasonable or likely to accomplish anything”.

More evidence that the legal system is dysfunctional and ran by either idiots or liars.

38 posted on 08/17/2023 1:28:38 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: deks

There was a time where the democratic narrative (Even used by Brett Braier) of 70 lawsuits never producing any evidence of voter fraud. My recollection is that is not true. I believe every one of the 70 lawsuits by Trump were thrown out on civil procedure, technical grounds of either too early, not ripe or too late? Trumps claims were never heard on the merits, as far as I know. Please correct me if I’m wrong. thanks


39 posted on 08/17/2023 1:29:30 PM PDT by STJPII ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
That person is all on board with the Stalinist show trials. Adds nothing to the discussion.

I get the impression that he's a lawyer, so he probably can't help himself.

40 posted on 08/17/2023 1:30:17 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson