Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

There are few ways to prevent the problem of regulatory capture except through limiting the ability of government to regulate commerce. The Founders saw regulation of commerce as entirely a state matter except with respect to foreign commerce, which was a Federal matter. There was always an issue with state governments showing favor to certain businessmen and companies and attacking others. Balancing that issue was the ability of a business to leave an unfriendly state to a friendlier one, a pattern we see in our day; as an example, gun manufacturers leaving unfriendly Connecticut for Southern states.


43 posted on 08/14/2023 9:10:14 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Wallace T.

Banning “revolving doors”—and I mean a lifetime ban—would be a step in the right direction.

No federal employee should be permitted to ever work for a business they regulated—directly or indirectly.

Nobody in an industry should ever be allowed to work for any agency that regulates that industry—directly or indirectly.

That would probably resolve over half of the regulatory capture.


44 posted on 08/14/2023 9:17:06 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson