This is the killer statement that damns everything she has said and done.
She has conceeded the point - Biden brought criminal charges to subvert his political opponent and in her view those criminal charges therefore stick because Trump's political campaing must be surrendered in the face of those criminal charges brought by his political opponent. Trump's 1st ammendment rights be damned as well.
You get it. Note a big difference in culture. The swamp, the establishment, thinks that deals impacting the public should not be done in public, but should be done in secret negotiations.
Hunter Biden negotiated outside the public eye.
Joe Biden negotiates outside the public eye.
Reagan negotiated his meeting with Russia in the public eye.
Trump negotiated with N Korea in the public eye.
Trump is an open book on social media. No secrets.
Jared met with Saudis and it was all public. If there were a Hunter type deal in Jared’s meeting the swamp media would be sure to let us know. But Jared did not hide what he was doing. The swamp media has nothing.
The swamp thinks that doing things in public inhibits negotiations. This is true whether the negotiations have high goals and sinful goals.
This observation is not a 100% v 0%. It is 80% v 20%. There are two very different views of the way governmental and public decisions should be made. Most, but not all, are on one side. Most, but not all, are on the other side.
[[The defendant’s desire to conduct a campaign, to respond to political opponents, has to yield.” ]]
The judge’s desire to be a tyrant and trample the right to speech of Trump has to yield!