Posted on 08/11/2023 9:01:12 AM PDT by Tell It Right
Well, then...from their point of view I guess the j6 committee was correct to destroy all their materials.
Not that there was anything wrong with that. /s
The Jamaican bimbo again. I think that’s why the DNC’s Mainstream “media” is trying to bring down and lynch Justice Thomas. The RATs don’t want to risk killing another Supreme Court Justice and they want to open another SCOTUS slot to put this idiot in.
And yet, it has been the prosecutor who has repeatedly leaked grand jury materials to major media. The Trump team should have made the “judge” aware of the prosecutor’s behavior and required penalties for further news stories
She getting help on how ride the line. If she goes full collaboration Roberts will have no choice but to step in.
Trump’s lawyer needs to ask the court if any constitutional protections are going to be afforded to his client or if he should just expect to be railroaded with no protection whatsoever. Seriously, is this just intended to be a show trial?
what about Smith leaking info to WaPo and NYT on a regular basis? Has she said anything about that?
The federal judge overseeing the election conspiracy
No talking
Exactly. I don’t think Trump leaked any evidence, just made some statements regarding it. They were more leaks from the prosecutor side.
My understanding is that this judge worked for BSF and represented Fusion GPS while she was there. She recused herself previously on something Trump related. Why has she not recused herself already on this?
She was too afraid to shut trump down entirely....If leaked papers suddenly showed up in the NYT and everybody would know the enemy handed them out...That would make her look bad...I doubt she wants to shut down trump’s would be executioners......
Trump should not do this. Its exactly what they want. He should take freedom of speech in a general election quickly to supreme court every time and as often as he can. They want to control what he can say. That is the whole point of the trials.
A secret trial of a political opponent.
We will not accept any guilty verdict if any information is withheld.
They did. She ignored
They can get fancy with what they call it but it’s a gag order ... plain and simple
Yes, he may share any evidence that is detrimental to his defense. Everything else is “sensitive”.
Can’t allow defendants to defend themselves.
Here’s what a real judge does.
Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod declared in court on Thursday
<><>that the Biden administration’s efforts
<><>to persuade social media to remove, throttle and suppress (what he considers is) “misinformation”
<><> specifically info on (a) COVID-19, (b) Hunter Biden’s salacious laptop and (c) stolen elections
<><>reminded her of a Mafia movie.
That was just one of the most memorable examples of the frosty reception Biden Justice Department Civil Division lawyer, Daniel Tenny, received Thursday from the three-judge panel WRT whether to lift or modify Biden’s ban between the feds and social media........
People need to understand that the judiciary and legal system is mostly under their control right now. We may have the Supreme Court, but they have control over the DAs, the trial lawyers, and much of the local and federal district courts. The days of impartial legal proceedings are over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.