I don’t think you can compare one region or state of the country with another region. The opposite would have happened in New York, California or Chicago.
The anti-abortion voters were not all anti-abortion activists but pro-State Rights people leaving it to the states to decide and there are many of those as well but not as many as the anti-abortion voters. But they did help push this issue into a victory. To go back and try to federalize it will lose the State Rights voters that’s the pivot.
Americans don’t need BIG Government to save us, they need GOD. Go out and sell Him.
Agreed, and that is exactly what happened in CA, IL, and MI -- they enshrined super-abortionality.
"The anti-abortion voters were not all anti-abortion activists but pro-State Rights people leaving it to the states to decide and there are many of those as well but not as many as the anti-abortion voters. But they did help push this issue into a victory. To go back and try to federalize it will lose the State Rights voters that’s the pivot."
I think that's right as well. My initial reply contained info that Ky Amendment 2 would have passed if it had just been restricted to preventing abortion funding, instead the rest of it was written in the negative (as so many referendum are by necessity) and that confuses voters.
Similarly, Kansas Amendment, which enabled prosecutions, damn near begged for them (prosecutions), and Arrowheads ridiculously think of KC as N'Orleans north, which combined with the KC ghetto absurdity of continuing their self-genocide at any costs, doomed that noble effort.
Montana was simply a one-off to, again, enable prosecutions in the hope of driving out the abbatoirs, rather than legislatively, commandingly, driving the snakes out of the temple. That will never happen in a state where Kalifornians have established a Moloch beachhead.