Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j.havenfarm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No. Did they actually exclude those sectors?????

Heck. Why did they stop there? Surely they could look at any sector that has an inflation rate over, say, -2% and exclude those as well?

Then they could trumpet even more economic success for the megaphones of truth, such as WSJ, NYT, WAPO, and, of course, The Hill.

And there are people, lots of them, who would believe it.

What an Effing Joke.


12 posted on 08/10/2023 6:57:41 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

I dont remember when, but it was many years ago that those volatile sectors were pulled out. If you force me to guess I’d say it was under Bush II. So it’s been government policy for a very long time that these stats should actually not be informative


34 posted on 08/10/2023 8:14:38 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson