Posted on 08/07/2023 5:15:04 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
I favor the Central Park option.
-fJRoberts-
Is this legal? I mean, the whole concept of a “park” is to preserve the land for public use. A migrant camp does not seem like a legitimate use of a park. It’s one thing if a private person uses the park for their own ad-hoc purpose; it’s quite another for an official government action to repurpose a park.
I’m sure this varies from one local government to another, and quite possibly from plot to another within a government (such as what was the circumstances by which the government came to own the land).
TRUE!
The real reason for RCV in New York is to prevent a freak election of a conservative like James L. Buckley ever again. Buckley won that see by defeating a RINO and a typical liberal Democrat in a three-way race in 1970. It could never have happened with RCV.
"Brookyln’s ultra-liberal neighborhoods. Another migrant camp may soon be coming to Manhattan’s Central Park.
And the first one to squawk proves "you ain't liberal".(to paraphrase Biden-the-senile.)
Sunset Park....Elite???
Not really, unless it’s gentrifying since I left NY. The Gowanus Canal (most polluted waterway in America is its claim to fame) is on the north side and the Gowanus Expy. runs through it over 3rd Ave. On the west side is the East River, the Bush Terminal and the Brooklyn Army Terminal. East is Borough Park and south is Bay Ridge.
I was mocking the “Elite” designation.
Gotcha. Should go in Central Park, or Prospect Park, Washington Square Park, Bryant Park, Battery Park, lots of room there.
my son lived in bay ridge for a while
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.