Did Trump pay for any statewide recounts, such as Wisconsin? Nope. Arizona? Nope. Elsewhere? Nope.
It is lame to say he relied on courts to order them and then went cheap on his really really good choice of attorneys that got laughed at nearly everywhere.
But you like to claim offense instead of addressing the questions and facts available. Sad, your loss.
And now you twist things around.
Your original comment is
Absolutely. Of course ‘did not prove to be true’ because Trump did not hire the best attorneys and did not pay for the necessary recounts. The result was a failed attempt to prove the election was stolen, which we all saw.
If the court doesn’t allow a recount, because in most cases, they said Trump had no standing, you can’t claim any of the information about Trump not hiring the best attorneys and did not pay for the recounts is true.
You’re just trying to link an outcome - being denied a recount, with bad, unprovable conclusions - Trump had poor attorneys and didn’t want to pay for recounts.
What good does recounting fake ballots do?
When they did an audit of Arizona's Maricopa county they discovered 75,000 fake ballots in an election that was swung by 11,000 votes.
Recounting fake ballots doesn't solve anything. They did that in Georgia, and it just showed the same fake result that you get when you count fake ballots.