Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th

Sure! After the conquest of Europe and all the resources and manpower Russia would gain, guess who is next on the list? Better to wait until there is no choice, and then send your kids to die on the home front, right?

Isolationism brought WWI and WWII. To have peace prepare for war, not something isolationist think about, because once they get their way, they go right for the unilateral disarmament route.

You go to war with what you have, not with what you wish you had. With Isolationism you have no military, no capabilities, and are easy pickings.

The world is not a bunch of separate countries any longer - where does you medicine come from? Where does a lot of the food in the US come from? Its all interconnected.

And thinking we could just do and make all that stuff ourselves over night, so to speak, is just not possible. There are not enough people in the US with the necessary skills now, where do you think you would find them to in the future to build out the US economy?


37 posted on 08/04/2023 1:27:49 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: PIF
"Sure! After the conquest of Europe and all the resources and manpower Russia would gain, guess who is next on the list? "

You forget this country has already been taken over by Commies from within, and Russia wasn't even involved...but China was. And what better time for any world power to attack us, since the Democrats have literally destroyed this country, the U.S. Constitution, our election system, the Presidency, and the military. We're sitting ducks, and Russia wasn't even involved. But China was.

Take the U.K. for example. Long before WWI, they were a group of islands mostly dependent on imports to survive. During WWI and WWII, when the shipping lanes were targeted by the Germans, their ability to import necessary items was drastically impeded. Did they do anything after WWI to try to make themselves more independent on imports? No! In WWII, Britain had to ration everything, and continued rationing into the mid-50's. Have they done anything since WWII to make themselves less dependent on imports? No! So why should the U.S. be concerned if the U.K. has chosen to continue to be morons when it comes to being able to provide for themselves? Where does our concern stop? Does it stop after we've destroyed our own country by worrying about other countries, that we know would either never be willing, nor able to come to our aide if it was us that needed the help? Why is this crap always one-sided?

41 posted on 08/04/2023 1:39:30 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: PIF

“Sure! After the conquest of Europe and all the resources and manpower Russia would gain, guess who is next on the list?”

Put down your bong and quit living on fantasy.
I can smell the smoke you are blowing up peoples butt from here.


63 posted on 08/04/2023 2:43:46 PM PDT by Right Brigade (It was better before they voted for whats his name,this must be the New World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson