Posted on 08/03/2023 6:36:43 AM PDT by george76
Indicted by who exactly? 🤔
I don’t think smith has to worry about getting indicted by merrick garland or the doj
Why wait. Indict the RAT butt boy now!
ALL D.C. Crimes should be moved to flyover country, for Jury Trials, to eliminate Jury Nullification, and gallows should be built and ready.
In the days of REAL patriots and REAL Americans, lynching in the town square of caught-in-the-act criminals eliminated repeat offenders, and additionally cleared the town of n'er-do-wells......
If they press on, indictments will be the least of their worries.
I highly doubt you can indict a person for bringing a case to court. One filled with republican witnesses. I guess it can be tried, but I highly doubt it will go anywhere.
Its an absolutely valid observation that the Democrats, in the interests of self preservation, will be desperate to win the Presidency in 2024. If Trump wins, as Obama has noted it very well may happen, he will go after his tormentors. The Democrats have shown that ex Presidents, their associates, donors, family and even their lawyers are fair game. The slimy Democrats, their big donors and the key people in their cabalknow what is in store for them if Trump wins.
Until there are real consequences for the enemies of America they will strive to destroy us as a nation and soon each of us who adhere to Americanism
Dershowitz is acting as if there is still some measure of fairness within the justice system.......he must have just gotten back from his trip to Mars. SMH
“Smith secured a four-count indictment”
Indicted by who indeed.
Imagine a group of sub-room temperature IQs listening intently to a fatuous fraud who dresses like he’s the Imperial Guardian of the Galaxy.
Anyone here been to DC lately? Know some of y’all live there. I walked into a Walmart there the other day and it was like being in the Star Wars bar scene. English was a definite minority language, as spanish, hindi, arabic and of course Ebonics were far more prevalent.
And that’s who Mad Jack regales with his slanted “evidence” to get these Soviet Show Trial “indictments”.
The Democrats (who Dershowitz has and will continue to vote for) will indict the guy they just put in charge of taking down Trump by any legal trick available ?
I am beginning to think Law School is detrimental to ones cognitive abilities.
If they don't, it sets a terrible precedent. And this is not about Trump. Because if what Smith is doing is allowed to stand, anyone who questions the "approved narrative" is a target.
The Left (primarily) continuously tells us this is what they want--"hate speech", "anti-vaxxer", "Putin puppet", "climate science denier".....with a little digging, you can pull up examples of people wanting to put in jail or worse those they designate into those categories.
If they don't, it sets a terrible precedent. And this is not about Trump. Because if what Smith is doing is allowed to stand, anyone who questions the "approved narrative" is a target.
The Left (primarily) continuously tells us this is what they want--"hate speech", "anti-vaxxer", "Putin puppet", "climate science denier".....with a little digging, you can pull up examples of people wanting to put in jail or worse those they designate into those categories.
Disgraced “Duke lacrosse prosecutor” Mike Nifong would probably disagree with you.
Mike Gallagher said yesterday that this smith guy has struck out at the SCOTUS every time he’s argued a case there, which tells me it’s all about hamstringing Trump as much as possible.
I’d like to see a picture of President Trumps peers.
Dersh is missing the key point of the rushed indictment. It is merely a cut and paste from the Jan 6 select committee. It isn’t intended to survive a legal challenge. Its only purpose was to get the Devon Archer testimony out of the headlines and away from the Sunday talk shows.
EC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.