Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChessExpert; xzins
By the way, Vivek said he'd be willing to consider such an argument.

Maybe he’s not ready to take the office. Maybe he needs to study the issues before shooting off his mouth.

According to his words he would veto a late term abortion ban.

He has exposed himself either as a pro abortion candidate or an ignoramus.

97 posted on 07/28/2023 7:57:48 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

“Ramaswamy said he is “open to persuasion” if a constitutional scholar convinces him otherwise, but right now, if elected president, he would not sign a law to limit or ban abortions.”

As things stand now, it’s up to the states to decide the abortion issue. That’s the way it was before Roe vs. Wade. Conservatives wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade and we did so.

Now you want more. Who is promising you more? Will they be willing and able to follow through?


123 posted on 07/28/2023 8:51:09 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Required for informed consent: "We have a new, experimental vaccine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson