Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

“Here’s a situation to consider. A person was definitely born in the United States. He has proof positive. But his mother slept around a lot. She has no clue who the father is. He could have been an American citizen. He could have been a Greek sailor or a visiting Swedish diplomat. Is this person eligible for the presidency? I’d say yes.”

A semi-foundling.

An interesting “special case”.

If no father is available to claim such a domestically-born child at the time of birth, or to appear on the Certificate of Birth, and the child were to decide at least 35 years later to run for the U.S. presidency, let him or her make the NBC argument. The Supreme Court could probably justify finding in such a candidate’s favor.


235 posted on 07/27/2023 5:33:48 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: one guy in new jersey
The Supreme Court could probably justify finding in such a candidate’s favor.

Which is precisely why the court does need to discern the Founders meaning and make a ruling accordingly.

My money's on born on US soil, AND of US citizen parentS.

264 posted on 07/27/2023 6:27:49 PM PDT by null and void (Intelligence has limits, while gullibility doesn't. ~ SunkenCiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson