If he was born within the United States to parents legally within the United States at the time of his birth, he is a natural born citizen. Period. That is what the phrase meant at the time it was written, and has been adjudicated multiple times.
That appears to be the case with him, therefore, he is a natural born citizen. It is absolutely false to state otherwise. This twitter poster is ignorant at best and could not possibly have done any significant research into the subject - and of course neither did you before posting.
No, his parents weren’t naturalized as citizens when he was born. He’s a statutory Citizen but not an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen.
Unless he was an Indian.
That is what the phrase meant at the time it was written, and has been adjudicated multiple times.
What did they decide about the Indians?
Did they suddenly become citizens at some point?
Was it retroactive back to 1868?
I just want you to understand just how d@mned silly is the argument that the 14th makes people into "natural citizens."