Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coalminersson

My understanding is that many claim a soul becomes part and parcel at conception. My question is since these souls are sinless, wouldn’t they be assured a place in heaven? Same for the stillborn and those that die in the womb. Aren’t they better off than those born into a sinful world and fall prey to it?


19 posted on 07/26/2023 5:20:55 PM PDT by joesbucks (It’s called love-bombing. Claiming he’s saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks
My understanding is that many claim a soul becomes part and parcel at conception. My question is since these souls are sinless, wouldn’t they be assured a place in heaven? Same for the stillborn and those that die in the womb. Aren’t they better off than those born into a sinful world and fall prey to it?

By that reasoning, we should also think nothing of killing the already born innocents up to the age of 7, which is widely considered the age of reason at which time moral culpability begins. If God has allowed a human person to be conceived, he has made that person to live, not to be destroyed because of our sinfulness.

26 posted on 07/26/2023 6:35:33 PM PDT by fidelis (👈 Under no obligation to respond to rude, ignorant, abusive, bellicose, and obnoxious posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

not an expert on the subject. But people are saying now they won’t bring a child into a world like this. Well the world will change how many times in the baby’s lifetime. So to deny life now eliminates the option the world


37 posted on 07/27/2023 8:04:58 AM PDT by coalminersson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson