Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnthonySoprano
The problem with any allegedly confidential material is that you can't "unring the bell." If the judge did not seal it, and it turned out to be confidential, that would be irresponsible in the extreme.

And a judge can't assume that one side is telling the truth, no matter how obvious it seems. Prejudging before a hearing is bad judging.

This is simply an order to preserve the status quo. But I would bet you that he's going to believe the court clerk WAY ahead of some random attorney.

39 posted on 07/25/2023 8:16:42 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

.
It’s a She.

But, I really hope you’re right.


40 posted on 07/25/2023 8:21:26 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson