Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

Having to be hamstrung by constantly looking ahead and planning your trips and days according to the limited range of an EV, a range that fluctuates wildly depending on ambient conditions, is the very definition of unviable.

Both AC and heating greatly reduce the range. I guess limiting driving in the moderate seasons of the year is the answer.


32 posted on 07/25/2023 8:30:47 AM PDT by fwdude (Conservatism isn't just an ingredient you can add to a sh*t stew & call it good. It's comprehensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

Plus the ability to remotely kill the car’s ability to take a charge.


34 posted on 07/25/2023 8:33:27 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
I always thought that EVs were intended to be local around-town or daily commuter cars, but they became luxury vehicles and virtue signaling emblems.

I think the high entry cost of EVs made them too costly to be limited to short-hop driving, and so they were being positioned as replacements for the family vehicle. Once that happened, their strength became their liability as their range became a limiting factor not present in short-hop errand driving.

In fact, this thread from July 4 began with a chart that attempted to prove that EVs are more efficient from an total emissions standpoint, but I think I proved that the hybrid actually is more efficient when viewed from a per capita miles driven standpoint.

-PJ

41 posted on 07/25/2023 8:41:28 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson