“I am guilty of not spelling out that distinction for the benefit of those who do need is specifically spelled out.”
Sounds a lot like a non-apology.
“So when you say a digital currency is no more evil than a gun...”
That’s called an analogy - it’s used to make a point.
And you yourself said in your last post that... “You do realize that electronic currency in and of itself is not intrinsically evil” I agree.
But you keep changing your mind.
Again it’s not the inanimate object that’s evil, but the person(s) that use it in an evil way. And evil people will always find something that they can use in a bad way.
I think we’ve beaten this dead horse to death.
Yes. You are apparently pretty astute. “News Flash”: There was a reason you perceived it as a “non-apology”.