Posted on 07/25/2023 4:28:13 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide
An urgent investigation is needed into why excess deaths are near pandemic levels, because the lack of an explanation is fuelling “wild and dangerous theories”, experts warn.
Government figures suggest the number of extra or “unnecessary” fatalities this year is higher than 2021 and 2022, and on a trajectory that could even surpass 2020.
Of particular concern is the 15 to 44 age group, where cumulative deaths are tracking above all recent years, including 2020.
National Trust free passes in Friday's paper Experts call for urgent investigation as excess deaths spark ‘dangerous’ theories The death toll in 2023 is nearing pandemic levels and the absence of an explanation is leading to wild theories. Experts warn that an urgent investigation into the matter is needed to curb dangerous theories and resulting anxieties.
Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, needs to launch an urgent inquiry into excess deaths (Image: Getty) An urgent investigation is needed into why excess deaths are near pandemic levels, because the lack of an explanation is fuelling “wild and dangerous theories”, experts warn.
Government figures suggest the number of extra or “unnecessary” fatalities this year is higher than 2021 and 2022, and on a trajectory that could even surpass 2020.
Of particular concern is the 15 to 44 age group, where cumulative deaths are tracking above all recent years, including 2020.
Some commentators have suggested delayed medical treatment due to lockdown measures might be contributing to the rise.
Others have blamed the indirect impact of pandemic measures, such as increased loneliness and isolation, as well as a rise in alcohol consumption and recreational drug use.
Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty has previously hypothesised that rising non-Covid excess deaths could have been caused by a fall in heart drug prescriptions. But subsequent research has shown there was no such drop.
It was also claimed doctors’ strikes coincided with the jump in deaths. However, the British Medical Association said walkouts were not “the root cause”. It insisted: “There was no change in mortality trends during strike action.”
The latest figures mean that since 2019 more deaths are being recorded each week than the five-year average. Only a small proportion of these are now being directly attributed to Covid.
Dr Charles Levinson, Medical Director of private GP service Doctorcall, said the “silence” from Government was allowing conspiracy theories to flourish, including from anti-vaxxers.
He said: “A refusal to openly discuss these statistics is an abdication of responsibility from parts of the scientific community, leading to an irreversible erosion of trust by parts of society.
“There has been radio silence on the crisis from almost all, leaving a vacuum which is being filled by dangerous theories.”
Last night Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-based Medicine at Oxford University, called for an urgent inquiry.
He said: “There has been a complete failure by the Government to investigate these deaths correctly. This means we don’t know how to prevent further unnecessary deaths, fuelling wild speculation about the drivers.”
The Department of Health and Social Care said: “A wide variety of factors have contributed to excess deaths in recent months and we’re taking action to reduce them.
“Our forthcoming Major Conditions Strategy will look at how best to diagnose and manage the main drivers of ill health and death.”
Hmmmm….whatever could be the cause? 🤔
So called experts are so puzzled🙃
Climate Change
Cancer is Exploding because of CV19 Vax – Dr. Betsy Eads
by Greg Hunter @ USA Watchdog.
“...Using fresh data just on breast cancers alone posted by the American Cancer Society on Cancer.org, Dr. Eads explains, “From Cancer.org in the year 2019, for those women under 45 years old (with breast cancer), it was 26,660. It 2020, it was 26,500. In 2021 when the CV19 vax rolled out, it was 26,561. . . .
Cancer was not seen in the initial rollout because it took some time for the spike protein delivery. So, in 2022, those numbers went from 26,561 to 47,000. That is a two-fold increase. That’s a direct result of the mRNA (CV19) shots. In 2023, it went up six-fold to 297,000 breast cancer cases, and we are not even done with 2023. That may be as high as 500,000 breast cancer cases. So, cancer is exploding, and there is a direct correlation to the mRNA (CV19) vaccines. . . . The data is just pouring out. The Department of Defense DMED data has cancers up 600% to 1,300%.”
https://usawatchdog.com/cancer-is-exploding-because-of-cv19-vax-dr-betsy-eads/
You mean Alex Jones style conspiracy theories - theories so nutty they could not possibly be true only they actually really come true. It isn't the theory part that is dangerous but the fact that corrupt indivduals, organizations, governments and international quasi-government organzations do dangerous things that injure the well-being of humans around the world in violation of the UN charter on human rights.
“dangerous theories”.?
No, it is the Jab. Not theory.
“We have to investigate, just so long as we don’t look at the giant Vaxxephant in the room. It’s NOT that, so stop staring at it!”
What a redundant name for Medicine which is supposed to be3 a science which means that by definition it is "evidence based" though science is a lot more than just evidence. It is also theories to explain evidence and then efforts to falsify the theories to prove they are broadly explanatory of a range of phenomenon.
Clots and Heart ailments caused by air conditioning, gas stoves and generators
Yes, the vaccine you were forced to get else lose your job is deadly. And that was its purpose.
Not to worry ..our replacements are here.
I'm just an average shitkicker, but even I know the COVID vaccine has killed more than it probably ever "saved" - because who's to say how many were "saved", but we know how many young people are keeling over unnecessarily after being required to take the shot.
Blame?
1. Drug companies for insufficient testing and overrated cost/benefit (lives) expectation.
2. FDA for "approving" it (even though they really didn't).
3. Doctors for toeing the line and encouraging the shot versus a little healthy skepticism (and adherence to oath, "first, do no harm").
4. Media for hyping the shot.
5. FEDGOV for hyping the shot.
6. Every company, organization or entity that required the shot as a condition of employment or belonging.
There's more than enough to go around.
It’s a mystery.
Wood stoves.
They poisoned us. They acted with malice and forethought and they have to pay for it.
Wouldn’t “expurts” already know?
Dangerous theories are now fatal.
Culling the herd.
They aren’t theories.
All vaxxes injure, kill people.
Deep State knew what could happen at a minimum, suspected what could happen at the worst.
They knew and didn’t give a damn about health, safety, efficacy...
Because CoupFlu has NEVER been about protecting public health anywhere on the sodding planet.
Let's talk about the actual conspiracy (not just a theory) of a coordinated effort to label and denigrate people who dared question this RNA bio-weapon as "anti-vaxxers". These people got all their actual vaccines but refused an untested medical experiment that is NOT a vaccine. Let's talk about the conspiracy between Pfascist korporations and government to change their definition of vaccine to encompass this untested medical experiment that is not a vaccine.
Also from the article: "A refusal to openly discuss these statistics is an abdication of responsibility from parts of the scientific community, leading to an irreversible erosion of trust by parts of society."
"Leading to"? No. The trust is already gone.
"Parts of the scientific community"? No. almost all of it, and those who did try to discuss it were fired, vilified, and de-platformed by Pfascist korporations colluding with korrupt governments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.