It had great significance that responsibility for appointing the President was given to States, with no role for any Federal institution except in cases where the Electoral College did not have a majority.
I wish States took their responsibility for this process more seriously.
It is a given that the December election contained no fraud.
Those electors were after the fact, of the fraud. They were the PRODUCT of fraud, the fraud that was perpetrated in the Nov elections, where the state electors were appointed, those same electors being fraudulently seated(appointed, assigned, whatever) by crooked controllers, secs of state, crooked state houses, and further down the chain, to the crooked lowly office worker overflowing the bathroom, then placing paper across windows so observers cannot see what is going on, (but forgetting to shut down the overhead cameras).
Who in their right mind believes these were above board processes?
So, if the view/statement is that the election for Trump was honest, because it was the December election that voted Biden in, that in and of itself is a misleading, erroneous conclusion, perhaps pure in it's wording, but certainly not in it's meaning, or conclusion.
I too, wish states would take this more seriously.
It may be up to the honest states, as a whole, to dispute and remedy the situation.
On an individual, and within a state basis, dishonesty with voting process must be rooted out, and those responsible addressed in a fashion where such action would involve great hesitation and risk of one's liberty, if not their very life.
The left screams about voter disenfranchisement when complaining about voter ID, and same day voting.
However, vote cheating, in a organized governmental action, under the protection of same, and carried out by same is the epitome of disenfranchisement, and must be eliminated, no excuse or exception.
Who has standing?