Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Openurmind
Maybe SCOTUS needs their own Ruling Compliance Division with the authority to arrest anyone who violates their rulings.

This is something that SCOTUS is going to have to address, and it goes far beyond gun control issues. When they make a ruling, and government loses, why should it take years for a new case to work its' way back up the chain when said government tries to institute a blatant end run around the court's ruling? And why should there not be sanctions meted out against against those government agencies engaged in that conduct?
8 posted on 07/17/2023 11:03:15 AM PDT by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog

“This is something that SCOTUS is going to have to address, and it goes far beyond gun control issues. When they make a ruling, and government loses, why should it take years for a new case to work its’ way back up the chain when said government tries to institute a blatant end run around the court’s ruling? And why should there not be sanctions meted out against against those government agencies engaged in that conduct?”

I completely agree. SCOTUS sets the “Law of the land”, why should government be immune to these same laws?

They won’t though... They sold their souls to the same demons government did.


10 posted on 07/17/2023 11:55:27 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson