“according to Tate”
Why would I care about anything “according to Tate” when he just outed himself as a bald-faced (and rather stupid) liar?
“Regarding the likes of “Only Fans”, it would seem such platforms are also “pimping” if monetizing the means and motivation is illegal.”
You want to condemn OnlyFans for being immoral and possibly criminal, go for it.
“But it’s not enough to condemn him simply through his various Social Media associations or affiliations.”
Oh I haven’t condemned him for anything like that. I’m just saying he is lying, because he is demonstrably doing that in this video, and very poorly I might add. I mean lying about the charges that you have been publicly indicted for is something you have to be very dumb to think you would get away with in the age of the internet.
>> Why would I care about anything “according to Tate” ?
That’s a question for you to answer, not me. I simply disclosed the source.
FRegards