Skip to comments.
Climate scientists push for access to world's biggest supercomputers to build better Earth models
Nature ^
| July 11, 2023
| by Jeff Tollefson
Posted on 07/12/2023 4:05:05 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
2
posted on
07/12/2023 4:06:03 AM PDT
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute. )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
until we have honest scientists....we're ..........
It's all about Grant Money and power.
Fauci is a good example of an honest scientist. /s
3
posted on
07/12/2023 4:14:23 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"researchers have spent decades building increasingly sophisticated global-climate models — but those models are straining the limits of available computing power."I think this means we are going to need a new pair of boots...
4
posted on
07/12/2023 4:15:19 AM PDT
by
unread
("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
To: quantim
GIGO
Exactly. The model will only be as good are as biased as those setting the parameters. If the so-called climate scientists develop the model with the underlying parameters of man-made climate change accelerating the model will show such an outcome. Flawed effort from the start.
5
posted on
07/12/2023 4:16:02 AM PDT
by
georgiarat
(We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it. William Faulkner )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“We meteorologists (aka “climate scientists”) must rule the world! The only things that stand in our way are ambitious accountants, land surveyors, and map makers who want the same thing.”
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She’s hot.
It doesn’t matter how powerful a computer is when your algorithm is shit.
7
posted on
07/12/2023 4:18:41 AM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Sacajaweau
It’s all about Grant Money and power.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That is EXACTLY what it is about. Grant money pays the bills.
And who funds the grants? Why we the people of course.
8
posted on
07/12/2023 4:23:29 AM PDT
by
mlitefan
(Long time lurker...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yup, that’ll help get incorrect predictions in much less time.
9
posted on
07/12/2023 4:37:28 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: quantim
“GIGO”
I’ll put it on a moral plane: dishonesty in, dishonesty out.
To: georgiarat
It is quite simple, the “models” will say what the NeoNazi’s want it to say.
11
posted on
07/12/2023 4:43:41 AM PDT
by
Shady
(The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A faster computer won’t help. Their current models don’t comport with the satellite data. They keep on having to massage the data to fit their models.
12
posted on
07/12/2023 4:50:37 AM PDT
by
TheCipher
( RINO politicians in DC are the only reptiles in the world with no backbone)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Persistence.As a meteorologist I learned predicting the same conditions works best.
13
posted on
07/12/2023 5:01:23 AM PDT
by
larryjohnson
(FReepersonaltrainer)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“...Climate scientists push for access to world’s biggest supercomputers...”
What could go wrong??
14
posted on
07/12/2023 5:18:14 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
(“Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.” Thomas Sowell)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Don’t need ,just move their thermometers away from parking lots,heat exhaust fans where they get their supposedly warming temperature readings to perpetuate their fraud on the planet
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What’s wrong with building the Earth models with Legos?
16
posted on
07/12/2023 5:31:57 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(No more new laws until we start enforcing the crap we already have!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“settled science”....but we still need a gajillion dollars to get better accuracy because our models are limited.
All they have are models.
17
posted on
07/12/2023 5:32:56 AM PDT
by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
18
posted on
07/12/2023 5:51:57 AM PDT
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
earth is the biggest model and they still cannot interpret the data correctly.
19
posted on
07/12/2023 5:53:41 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
To: quantim
GIGO.
Exactly. No amount of computing power will produce meaningful results if the data and underlying assumptions are faulty.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson