Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

An additional way to attack the problem is to put some constraints on the post office’s handling of returned ballots. It would be great to get all the bogus addresses off the voter rolls, but what shall we do with the ones that slip through?

One approach is to bring a lawsuit requiring the post office to keep a record of the number of returned ballots, place them in a safe location, and have the stored returned ballots made available for inspection by representatives of both parties to ensure that no ballots are removed.

A federal injunction could see that this practice is followed nationwide. If talk about the “sanctity of elections” is to be backed up with actions, such a move should not be opposed.

Another possible approach would be an injunction banning mailing out ballots unless it’s verified that an actual voter lives at an address: In other words, states would be enjoined from mailing ballots to addresses on the Undeliverable Ballot Database. Of course, judges would have to be convinced that the information on the UBD actually belongs there.


2 posted on 07/11/2023 8:57:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

put some constraints on the post office’s handling of returned ballots.
///

post office is run for and by the democrats.

how do you put constraints on the post office under those circumstances.


7 posted on 07/11/2023 9:19:03 AM PDT by ckilmer (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson