traditionally, citizenship, follow the father, then in the 60s I believe the law changed to follow either parent. Therefore, it seems as a practical matter that, if at least one parent is a US citizen, and the child is born in the US, there seems to be support that that kid is a citizen. But is there a clarity about whether the child is a natural born citizen since the second parent is not a citizen. if the child does not have dual citizenship, then it makes a clearer argument.
I and a few others are of the firm opinion, that if the child does not have two citizen parents, they are not a natural born citizen. They are just a citizen. Therefore, they are not eligible for president or vice president.
Personally, I will not vote for a ticket that includes someone not eligible to be president.
I understand your position.
Others say, that if you are a citizen by birth, and didn’t have to go through the naturalization process, as an immigrant, to become a citizen, then you are natural born.
There are people on Free Republic on both sides of the issue. I suspect the general public doesn’t care or know about this issue at all.
Realistically, your position will not stop anyone from running for president or vice-president. I wish the courts will address this, but they probably never will.
I expect this to come up in the future more and more, as so many immigrants, legal and otherwise, have come to America in recent decades. And we will see more and more politicians who are 1st generation of their families born in America. There too, would be good to have a definite court ruling on what natural born citizenship means.