[Apple Pan Dowdy]

” imagine that 42% support “sex changes for children” “

No, that is not true. The article said and it was repeated in the post just above yours….. “Though that sounds very close, many Presbyterians opposed it not because they supported sex changes for children, but because they disagreed that it was the church’s role to petition the government over matters of public policy."

[PGR88]

The Westminster Confession of Faith 31.4 says that “Synods and councils …are not to intermeddle with civil affairs which concern the commonwealth, unless by way of humble petition in cases extraordinary; or, by way of advice, for satisfaction of conscience,

I understand that churches don't want to get engaged in government - but all these good Presbyterians feel that allowing society to mutilate children under the guise of a flash-in-the-pan post-modern ideology doesn't rise to the level of "conscience?"

[Apple Pan Dowdy]

I agree with what you are stating here. When I said you are wrong, I was speaking about your saying “42% were in support of sex change for kids”. They were NOT in support of that, they believed they should stay out of sending a letter to congress. I am glad, though, that the other side won the vote.